This is play acted in three sections written by Henrik Ibsen. It is indeed an imperative for play because of its dire tone towards the relationships issues as well as the norms nineteenth century. The play aroused vital controversy at the time, having protagonist Nora, separating from her husband and children for the simple reason that she wants to exploit her potential. However, the author was extremely enthusiastic in developing the theme since the society is male dominated. The independency of women is forbidden in the society where the play was acted. Interestingly, men formulate the policies and implement them from a masculine standpoint of judges to oversee and assess feminine conduct. Ibsen was raised from a humble family. He married Suzannah Thoreson. He had the conviction that partners should have equal roles and responsibilities and live as equal principals, free to become their own boss. The notion of living as equal partners with shared roles is precisely portrayed in Doll’s House.
In the play, Ibsen absolutely creates a depressing image of the vital roles and responsibility played by female individuals of any economic class with the context community. In conclusion, the play characters illustrate Nora’s proclamation that although male individuals have refused to let go their integrity, a good percentage of female in the society have shown good progress in the society and sacrifice their integrity as well. At the commencement of the play, Nora, the primary protagonist in the play show her exclusive submissiveness and loyalty. She affectionately re-joins Torvald’s, delightedly conversing about the extra earnings from her new commitments. Nora takes refuge and pleasure while enjoying the good time of her children and friends (Macphee, 2006). Nora seems to have forgotten her doll-like existence, where was coddled, pampered and patronized. She seems like a bit of a ditz. She does seem to bother when her lovely husband calls worst names like featherhead. Surprisingly, she seems to be enjoying and playing with them. Initially, we are inclined to agree when Torvald first calls her spendthrift. In the play, Nora has given the gatekeeper good treatment. Moreover, she has brought by herself huge Christmas presents and gifts but brush off the claims of accruing debts. Soon, the perception changes as we see that Nora has a lot more happening than we first expected. On the contrary, Christine is depicted as tough, though extremely learned with wisdom. She has witnessed and encountered various daring experiences. Christine confesses to Krogstad that experience has taught her to act prudently. Apparently, hard, bitter necessity have given her much more to learn. In conclusion, this paper will show how at time women used to sacrifice everything for their husbands. Nora is an exceptional case who did everything to her husband and children.
The sacrifice by Nora
Nora acted at some part of the play to prove wrong her husband. He has misunderstand Nora to be silly lady though not proved. Nora proved him wrong that her understanding and experience in business is undoubted. She has in-depth understanding of business and borrow money from the bank only when necessary like saving Torvald’s health. This is the reason why Nora incurred loans, however, she is a wise woman with extreme capacities to run big business. An account of Nora’s extreme effort to off-settle her debts show her fierce determination and ambition. Moreover, her willingness to go against the law to ensure Torvald’s health portrays her courageous traits in the society (Ibsen, & Worrall, 2008). Despite the blackmail from Krogstad, the aftermath’s trauma, Nora’s personalities does not change. However, she gets to learn much more concerning unexploited potentials. Finally, Nora confessed why she faked her personalities though it was not her wish. The faked personality was meant to please her father, Torvald and society. In a male chauvinism society, women are supposed to bend low whichever the circumstance or ranks.
Despite the economic advantages of Nora compared to her female counterparts in the play, she never opted to disregard her husband. Nora had a simple life with utmost respect and loyalty to her husband as dictated in the societal norms and doctrines. She tries to keep her loan the top-most secret of her life because her husband would never appreciate the facts that Nora saved his life through loan. Moreover, it is illegal and total disrespect in the society for a woman to acquire loan with formal consent from the husband. In this case, if the issue of loan spill over to his ears, then the wrath of the entire society would descend on Nora. She has the greatest obligation to work and settle the loan in secret. Women are often close to their children. However, Nora’s act of abandoning her children is an act of sacrifice. She is convinced the nanny would fairly treat them in the best their interest.
Nora’s understanding of freedom, particular women freedom is the primary theme of the play. Initially, she is convinced about her overwhelming freedom to be restored immediately upon settling her loan in time. Upon completing her loan, she will have time to commit on her domestic responsibilities. She reconsiders her conception of freedom upon receiving blackmails from Krogstad. In the end, she seeks a new kind of freedom and distances herself from Torvald. She seeks to relieve herself from household chores and obligations to pursue her ambitions, principles, and identity.
The theme of sacrifice is evident in Mrs. Christine Linde. During her teenage years, she extremely valued her family and sacrifice her love for anything other things. Fronted with an option of getting engagement with Nils Krogstad, she refused but chose a young entrepreneur Mr. Linde. This option was made in the best interest of supporting her sickling mother alongside her two younger brothers. She sacrificed and wrote a nasty text to her beloved Nils so that she can restore her peace. After the death of her husband, their business went kaput but she maintained working on crummy jobs to salvage her business. Apparently, Christine is free to live her desired lifestyle (Brunnemer, 2009). Unlike Nora, Christine understands women life is not complete without men. She desires to reunite with Nils so that they can bring up their children together. However, the primary distinction in the new Christine’s relationship and that of Helmers simple and precise. The two will be engaging in a relationship as equal partners. The play ends with the criticizing tone. The key protagonist, Nora refuse to pay respects to Torvald and kids. She walks away from the societal doctrine to face the world and seek her freedom. Some might call it foolish decision, but Nora believed the decision is pretty bold and final. The society does not respect single women. She does not have a job or home. The comfortable life she is leading will collapse.
Brunnemer, K. (2009). A Doll’s House. Human Sexuality, 9.
Ibsen, H., & Worrall, N. (2008). A Doll’s House. A&C Black.
Macphee, A. L. (2006). A Doll’s House. Meanjin, 65(4), 138.
More useful samples & examples in