It is undeniable that the need for discipline is a crucial necessity when inculcating positive behavior and shaping the character of children. Various methods of instilling discipline exist among them use of corporal punishment that attracts numerous debates on its utilization. Corporal punishment is the process of utilizing negative reinforcement through inflicting physical pain to a child as a technique of availing punishment for doing wrong in school or at home. The discipline style’s prevalence was in the 1970s, while presently, many countries engage in spirited discussions of the merits and demerits of this form of punishment.
Corporal punishment is beneficial as it is effective. Applying negative consequences towards children’s actions deemed, as bad behavior effectively instills discipline by imparting fear and knowledge of the impending consequence of doing wrong. Therefore, when a child identifies a particular action to spanking or beating, they are more likely to avoid repeating the said behavior, hence acting as a deterrent. Moreover, its instant in nature maintains order by pushing students to behave appropriately.
Corporal punishment saves on cost. In today’s society, more parents and schools opt to correct bad behavior by sending children to therapists who necessitate them to speak out their minds and outline the causes of their actions or boot camps where they are required to learn discipline and change their behavior. However, beating or spanking of children occurs immediately upon the identification of a wrong behavior, giving parents and teachers an opportune time to provide an instant and swift punishment that correct the said behavior once straightaway. Thus, when utilizing this form of punishment at home or in school saves on the costs associated with the other method of disciplining a child.
Contrary, corporal punishment leads to low self-esteem and fear. Hitting and spanking results in traumatizing of children that precipitate them to consider themselves as bad people who have to be hit to improve, thereby developing low self-esteem. Additionally, constant beatings of children to instill proper manners makes them fearful of the people beating them. Consequently, children begin avoiding said parents or teachers, thereby developing strained relationships while in schools, the fear of corporal punishment elicits the increase in cases of school dropouts.
Corporal punishment is not always effective. Although in some cases, children reared with this form of reprimand mature into responsible and controlled individuals, in others it fails to facilitate positive outcomes. For instance, some kids exposed to this disciplinary method become accustomed and develops a thick skin towards it, subsequently, eliminating any fears and successive effectiveness of its use. Hence, become less likely to change. Moreover, hitting and spanking children repeatedly foster tendencies of hostility towards those that inflict this pain, and they push back. Moreover, people earn values such as respect and civility as opposed to forcing them on others. Therefore, continued hitting would not instill them.
Corporal punishment is prone to instigate violence and abuse. In instances where a teacher or a parent is frustrated or angry with an issue, anger is highly likely to consume them when instituting corporal punishment, causing them to cross the line leading to the transformation of affectionate discipline into inflicting injuries and emotional scars to children. Moreover, individuals raised with painful beatings can develop violent tendencies that they associate with receiving respect and obedience ensuing in violence.
In instilling discipline, every parent is accountable for the children they raise. Since no parent in their right mind enjoys inflicting pain, a wide array of punishments are available. For those who require efficient, instant and cost-effective discipline regimen, corporal punishment is favorable.
More useful samples & examples in